1 · The problem
Money spread across six places, and no one seeing the whole
Families keep salary, funds, EPF and fixed deposits in different places, so a shortfall shows up only when a bill is due. By then the easiest fix is a loan.
1 · The problem
Families keep salary, funds, EPF and fixed deposits in different places, so a shortfall shows up only when a bill is due. By then the easiest fix is a loan.
2 · The HMR architecture
Account Aggregator brings in data with consent. A rules engine calculates every figure. An AI assistant explains the plan, and a SEBI-registered adviser approves anything that names a product.
3 · The worked result
The first plan found a ₹7,600 monthly gap and ₹1,88,000 of idle cash. Moving that cash closed the gap, funded the car outright and kept six months of emergency cover intact.
Reference build. HMR designed this system for a SEBI-registered advisory firm or a bank's wealth team. The household below is fictional, and every figure on this page is calculated from the inputs and assumptions shown. None of it is a client result.
Most households do not plan badly. They plan in pieces. Salary lands in one bank, mutual funds sit in an app, EPF lives on a government portal and the school fee arrives as a surprise every April. Nobody sees the whole picture, so a shortfall shows up only when a bill is due. By then the easiest fix is a loan.
A personal financial advisor should close that gap. It looks at what the family has, what it spends and what is coming, then shows the shortfall while there is still time to fix it cheaply. The hard part is not the maths. It is getting complete data with consent, keeping every number correct and keeping a qualified person in charge of advice.
HMR insight: A plan is only useful if the family can check every number in it. So the AI explains the plan, and a rules engine does the arithmetic.
The Rao household in Pune is invented for this case study. Two earners, one child aged seven, a home loan and savings spread across six places.
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Take-home pay, both earners | ₹2,20,000 a month |
| Household spending | ₹95,000 a month |
| Home loan EMI | ₹42,000 a month (₹38,00,000 outstanding at 8.5%) |
| Existing SIPs | ₹20,000 a month |
| Left over each month | ₹63,000, sitting in a savings account |
| Savings account and fixed deposits | ₹4,10,000 and ₹6,00,000 |
| Mutual funds | ₹14,50,000 |
| EPF, PPF and NPS | ₹24.4 lakh in total |
Three costs are coming. The child starts an undergraduate degree in 11 years, which costs ₹20 lakh at today's prices. The family car needs replacing in two years, at ₹10 lakh today. School fees of ₹1,80,000 fall due every April.
The advisor's first run found three things the family had not seen.
Moving the spare ₹1,88,000 into the car fund cut the monthly set-aside from ₹43,000 to ₹34,700. That closed the gap, and the car can now be bought outright.
| Goal | Target | Monthly set-aside | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| Car in 2028 | ₹11.03 lakh | ₹34,700 | 5% price rise, 6.5% on deposits |
| Degree in 2037 | ₹46.6 lakh | ₹12,600 | 8% cost rise, 10% return, ₹6 lakh of funds set aside |
| School fees each April | ₹1,80,000 | ₹15,000 | Fees unchanged this year |
| Buffer | ₹700 | What remains of the ₹63,000 |
The emergency fund stays at ₹8,22,000, untouched. Their home loan runs its course in about 145 months, and the family's EPF, PPF and NPS grow to about ₹1.14 crore by age 58 at an assumed 8%, before any new contributions.
Every plan rests on assumptions, so the advisor shows how the answer moves when one changes.
| If this happens | The degree set-aside becomes |
|---|---|
| Returns average 8%, not 10% | ₹15,700 a month |
| The ₹6 lakh is spent on something else | ₹19,900 a month |
The family sees these before they agree to the plan, not after.
Reminders then arrive before each set-aside, fee or renewal is due, so no one learns about a gap on the day it matters. We split the system so that each part does one job and can be tested on its own.
| Layer | What it does | Built with |
|---|---|---|
| Consent and data | Pulls bank, fund and insurance data with consent, and takes manual entries | Account Aggregator, as a Financial Information User |
| Planning engine | Works out goals, set-asides, loan costs and gaps | Python rules engine, versioned formulas |
| Assistant | Explains the plan and answers what-if questions | Language model behind an agent gateway |
| Adviser console | Queue for any advice that names a product | Web app with named approvers |
| Reminders and audit | Due-date alerts and a complete log | Scheduler, PostgreSQL, OpenTelemetry |
Account Aggregators are regulated by the Reserve Bank of India. They pass data only with the customer's consent, and they do not store or process it. That gives the advisor complete, current data without asking families to upload statements.
The assistant never calculates. When a family asks what happens if they delay the car by a year, the assistant sends the question to the planning engine and explains the answer it gets back. Each result stores its inputs, the formula version and the assumptions used, so an adviser or auditor can recompute it.
Before launch, the engine is checked against a library of hand-worked cases. A result that does not match to the rupee fails the build. When a formula changes, old plans keep the version they were made with, and the family is told when a new version gives a different answer.
Three rules shape the design. Investment advice for a fee needs registration under SEBI's Investment Advisers Regulations, so specific product advice always goes through a registered adviser. Since February 2025, SEBI has made any regulated firm that uses AI solely responsible for the privacy of investor data and for the output of those tools. And India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act requires a clear purpose and consent for every use of personal data.
Each rule has a matching control. In the adviser console, approval is a step the software enforces. An audit trail shows who approved what, and a consent ledger records every purpose, expiry and revoke.
A typical team is one HMR architect, three engineers, one quality engineer and a part-time security lead, working with the firm's product owner and a registered adviser.
We do not promise outcomes before a pilot has run. We agree the measures up front:
If you run an advisory firm or a wealth business and want to see how this would fit your data and your advisers, start with our three-week Readiness Audit. You can also read how we govern AI in our own work in our AI governance policy, or talk to an architect.